Valley News Dispatch High School roundup
Riverview followed up a disheartening loss to West Shamokin with a relatively close contest against North Catholic, but still fell short, 16-0, on Saturday afternoon in Class A Eastern Conference action at Riverside Park in Oakmont.
Last week, West Shamokin shocked Riverview, 25-6, to snap a state-record 46-game losing streak.
For North Catholic (3-1, 3-1), sophomore running back P.J. Fulmore rushed for 150 yards and two touchdowns on 20 carries, and junior quarterback Ryan Kirby completed eight of 12 passes for 80 yards.
Junior quarterback Jason Anthony, who completed six of 15 attempts for 88 yards, and senior wide receiver Tim Wagner, who had two receptions for 44 yards, led Riverview (0-4, 0-4). The Raiders have been outscored, 81-14, and shut out twice this season.
Highlands 3, Burrell 0 — Two freshmen and a sophomore played big roles, as Highlands (7-2, 5-1) defeated Burrell (0-8, 0-6) in Section 2-AA. Freshman Kayla Beale scored twice, fellow ninth-grader Kara Bowser added another goal and sophomore goalkeeper Samantha Kovach made six saves.
Kiski Area 3, Connellsville 1 — Ryan Kanner, Matt Dziadosz and Dakota Lange scored for Kiski Area (6-1-1, 4-0-1) in a Section 1-AAA win over Connellsville (2-6-1, 0-5-1). Brandon Smail made three saves for Kiski.
Freeport won its annual tournament by beating Avonworth, 2-0, in the championship match.
Next Saturday, the Yellowjackets will compete in State College High School's 20-team Little Lion Invitational, which will feature some of the top teams in the state.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.