Pirates fans frustrated by team's 'Titanic' collapse
This was supposed to be the year.
Then it quickly disintegrated into the most painful year.
The Pirates on Saturday staved off extending their record streak of 19 consecutive losing seasons — at least for one night — when Andrew McCutchen belted a solo home run in the bottom of the ninth inning. But it seems unlikely that they will recover from a horrific second-half slump, and some of their fans might never recover.
“I'm done,” said lifelong Pirates fan Chuck Gibson, 34, of Monroeville. “I really got excited when they were doing so well this summer and then they became the Pirates again. It's beyond disappointing. I'm finished with them, and I don't think I'm the only one.”
This season was unlike any other during the past two decades.
While there were a couple of notably exciting seasons — they remained in the division race until the final week in 1997 and enjoyed a surprising first half in 2011 — something about this version of the Pirates was different through the season's first four months.
Sellout crowds were becoming common at PNC Park this summer, center fielder McCutchen had became the team's first legitimate superstar since Barry Bonds and the Pirates — yes, the Pirates — were 16 games over .500 through 108 games.
No team in MLB history has finished a season with a losing record after being 16 or more games over that mark at that point in the season.
But then, no team in MLB history has displayed futility like the Pirates.
In the span of two months, the crowds have diminished at PNC Park (except for weekends), a slump has removed McCutchen from his MVP front-runner status, and the Pirates are now closer in the NL Central standings to the laughingstock Cubs than the first-place Reds.
Still, the member of the Pirates who is most familiar with this streak hopes the fans stick around.
“We want to make the playoffs,” Neil Walker said. “When that day comes, that .500 number won't matter anymore. I understand it means a lot to fans to get to .500. It means a lot to me, too. Trust me, I understand it. But we are getting better. There's no doubt.”
To longtime fans like Gibson, this summer's surprising success was nothing more than a tease.
“The National League stinks. This was their chance,” Gibson said. “If they could have been competent during the last two months, they get a wild-card spot. But they couldn't.”
This final homestand serves as a reminder for what the team once was.
The Pirates finish the series against the Reds on Sunday and then have three games against the Atlanta Braves, the two teams they battled in the playoffs a generation ago.
When the playoffs begin in October, the Reds and Braves again will be battling for a World Series berth.
The Pirates will be where they've been for the past 20 years, banished from postseason contention and leaving their fans wanting much more.
Reliever Jared Hughes admits it would be nice to win the final four games to go 81-81.
“This city wants us to win,” he said. “We want to win, too. Hopefully we can get hot here at the end of the season.”
Gibson remains less than optimistic.
“I thought this was it during the summer,” he said. “But I was wrong. The Pirates were the Titanic.”
Josh Yohe is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.