Cardinals master comebacks
SAN FRANCISCO — As many times as he gets asked, Cardinals closer Jason Motte still has no perfect answer for how St. Louis found a way to win at Washington after trailing, 6-0, and get back to the NL Championship Series.
“These guys just prove what big hearts they have and how much they go out there and work their butts off,” said Motte, who was Friday night's winning pitcher. “Someone asked me last night how we keep doing it, and I said, ‘I don't know; maybe we're just stubborn. We just don't give up.' That's kind of how you have to be.”
St. Louis manager Mike Matheny will watch the game again, once things slow down, so he can appreciate what his Cardinals accomplished in beating the Nationals — the team with baseball's best record.
San Francisco skipper Bruce Bochy doesn't need another look to know how impressive the reigning World Series champions' ninth-inning comeback was for a 9-7 victory in the nation's capital.
Bochy's team had its own remarkable rally that's not quite as fresh as the Cardinals' feat: three wins at Cincinnati to advance after dropping the first two games of the division series at home.
The past two World Series winners are showing their championship mettle in mid-October. They face off in Game 1 of the NLCS on Sunday night at AT&T Park.
Left-hander Madison Bumgarner gets the ball for the Giants at home against 6-foot-5 right-hander Lance Lynn.
Bumgarner, a 16-game winner this year, lost Game 2 of the NL Division Series here to Cincinnati.
“I felt good last time, things just didn't go my way,” Bumgarner said. “That's the way this game is.”
While the Giants became the eighth team to come back from a 2-0 deficit in a best-of-five series and first to do it on the road, the Cardinals earned the biggest comeback ever in a winner-take-all postseason game, according to STATS LLC.
“It really hasn't sunk in,” Matheny said after an all-night, cross-country trip to the Bay Area. “I see a knockdown-drag-out ahead of us. I'm certain Major League Baseball has to be very pleased with the caliber of baseball that's happened so far in this postseason. And I don't see any reason why the excitement wouldn't continue. We're looking at two well-rounded teams.”
Daniel Descalso hit a tying, two-out single, and Pete Kozma added a go-ahead, two-run single to lead the Cardinals' rally.
The Giants waited out the game on their team plane still parked on the tarmac in Cincinnati. Players gathered around iPads to watch the improbable comeback.
The Cardinals have won all six of their games when facing elimination the past two years, down to their final strike not once but twice against the Texas Rangers in last year's World Series before prevailing.
“We love the dramatics. I'd like us to not keep waiting until the last strike,” pitcher Kyle Lohse said, “because that's too much for my heart to handle.”
The Giants barely beat St. Louis to San Francisco after getting delayed more than three hours as their plane refueled and dealt with mechanical problems. The plane had enough fuel to take the NL West winners to Washington. Instead, the Giants got to come home. They landed at 5:09 a.m.
“Everyone was rooting and cheering for the Cardinals because we wanted to go home,” third baseman Pablo Sandoval said. “Probably almost everybody was cheering for the Cardinals. Every guy was happy to be home. Once we were in the air, I slept the whole flight.”
Yankees manager Joe Girardi fell asleep before the NL clincher ended. The Cardinals were trailing, 7-5, was the last thing he remembered.
“This first round was probably as good as it gets,” he said. “Probably as good of baseball as we have seen when you talk about eight teams playing.”
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.