Huntington defends SEALS training
The Pirates' controversial Navy SEALS training program for its minor-league players escaped mention during season-ticket holders' questions to team management Friday at PirateFest. But then there was Saturday's Q&A at the David L. Lawrence Convention Center open to the so-called “general fans.”
One of them, Matthew Wein, 30, of Pittsburgh, raised the point while challenging the qualifications and expertise of assistant general manager Kyle Stark and director of player development Larry Broadway. Among his questions and comments, Wein cited “the techniques these guys are using in the minors, the militaristic garbage to train baseball players.”
In the face of widespread criticism, Pirates owner Bob Nutting last month said the program would be discontinued. But with the subject raised again, general manager Neal Huntington again was put on the defensive, explaining the motives and concepts behind the program. The Pirates are committed “to the best physical, best mental, best personal development we can get,” he said. “So if borrowing from the elite of the elites is a bad thing, I'm puzzled by that.”
Huntington asserted that “130 collegiate and Olympic teams have gained valuable insight, gained valuable experience from the Navy SEALS. We're not alone in our belief that these techniques work. As a matter of fact, these are the scientifically proven techniques that help young men grow, that help young men develop.”
Later, unprompted, Pirates president Frank Coonelly also defended the training methods.
After Huntington's answer, Wein left the microphone uttering “Hoka Hey,” the infamous calling card of the controversy taken from a motivational email sent by Stark.
Bob Cohn is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 412-320-7810.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.