Pirates owner Nutting 'incredibly optimistic' for 2013
BRADENTON, Fla. — Pirates owner Bob Nutting stressed Wednesday that contract extensions, such as the one given this week to manager Clint Hurdle, are no guarantee unless the team improves.
“The mindset is, we must take a step forward. We expect to win,” Nutting said on the first day of his visit to spring training camp. “The idea that an extension is somehow a free pass is exactly the message that I would not want to send.”
On Tuesday, the Pirates picked up Hurdle's option for 2014 and added a club option for '15.
“We've shown we're willing to make a change if we need to, irrespective of contract terms,” Nutting said. “Clint knows that. Everyone in the organization knows that.”
In October 2009, manager John Russell was secretly given an extension through the 2011 season. The deal finally was announced in June 2010. Four months later — after a 57-105 finish, five fewer wins than in the previous season — Russell was fired with a year left on his contract.
The Pirates went 72-90 in Hurdle's first season and 79-83 last year. Both seasons were marked by second-half swoons that took the club out of the National League Central race.
“Given the improvements with the team — whether at the trade deadline last year, the offseason acquisitions or just the development of our young core of players — I'm incredibly optimistic we're in a position to take another step forward,” Nutting said.
When asked how he would define a “step forward” this season, Nutting said he doesn't have an interim step between another losing season and winning the World Series. The Pirates have not had a winning season since 1992.
“At some point we're going to need to pass through 82 wins,” Nutting said. “When we do, I will celebrate. But it would be an inappropriate target. If that had been the goal, (general manager) Neal (Huntington) would've gone about his work the last five years very differently.”
Huntington's contract also runs through next year with a club option for 2015. Huntington's tenure has had several highlights — the arrival of Pedro Alvarez, the additions of Gerrit Cole and Jameson Taillon, a restocked farm system. But the GM also has drawn fire for the controversial military-style training methods for prospects, a succession of poor free agent signings and trades at the deadline last season that may have upset the team's chemistry.
Nutting declined to comment on whether anyone in the front office is in line for extensions.
“Everyone knows what their job is and what we need to get done,” Nutting said. “I have a lot of faith in our management team and in the (club's) direction and improvement. Everyone would like things to continue to improve, and I expect that they will. It's important that I stand behind our management team and support them as long as they are our management team.”
However, Nutting endorsed Huntington's moves at the trade deadlines when the GM resisted the urge to deal away top prospects for high-profile big leaguers.
“What I hope we don't do is mortgage the future for the short term,” Nutting said. “We need to continue to focus on infusing talent in the organization.”
The Pirates will go into this season with a payroll of about $74 million — the largest in franchise history, although it still will be among the smallest in the majors. If the team is in contention, there probably won't be much wiggle room to add a pricey player at the July 31 deadline.
“To some degree, we have front-loaded this year,” Nutting said. “We need to make sure that coming out of spring training we have the very best team we can put on the field. We are not in a position where we've held back and kept a big reserve (of cash). That would be irresponsible. We've got to take a run. We've got to push the chips in early this season.”
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.