Pirates notebook: McPherson's promising start turns sour
• Kyle McPherson's outing Monday against the Tampa Bay Rays went well ... for the first four innings, at least. In the fifth, he yielded a pair of two-run homers, including Evan Longoria's titanic shot to left. “My game plan was to be aggressive,” McPherson said. “It was working, and then the fifth inning came around. (Longoria) is a good hitter, and he got the result he wanted on that pitch.” McPherson is vying for a rotation spot but doesn't know what to make of his chances after putting up a 8.46 ERA in six starts.
• James McDonald threw 98 pitches in 4 1⁄3 innings Monday against the Toronto Blue Jays' Triple-A team.
• Unless they are added to the 25-man roster (or disabled list) by Tuesday morning, pitcher Jonathan Sanchez and utilityman Brandon Inge can opt out of their minor league contracts. If either player stays with the Pirates and is sent to the minors, he'll receive a $100,000 retention bonus.
• The Pirates will move another step closer to bringing their short-season Single-A team to Morgantown, W.Va. Ben Hayes, president of the New York-Penn League, and Pat O'Connor, president of Minor League Baseball, will announce Tuesday at a news conference that one of the league's teams will relocate and share a ballpark with West Virginia University.
• The Pirates' workout from 1 to 3 p.m. March 31 at PNC Park will be free and open to fans.
• The Pirates will play their final game this spring at McKechnie Field on Wednesday.
— Rob Biertempfel
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.