Share This Page

Spring training breakdown: Blue Jays 6, Pirates 3

| Tuesday, March 26, 2013, 6:39 p.m.
Reuters
Pirates infielder Jordy Mercer forces out the Blue Jays' Emilio Bonifacio and throws to first to complete a double play on Jose Reyes during the second inning Tuesday, March 26, 2013, in Dunedin, Fla.
Reuters
Pirates starter Jonathan Sanchez pitches against the Blue Jays during the first inning Tuesday, March 26, 2013, in Dunedin, Fla.
Reuters
Blue Jays infielder Maicer Izturis prepares to tag out the Pirates' Felix Pie after Pie tried to stretch a single into a double during the fifth inning Tuesday, March 26, 2013, in Dunedin, Fla.
REUTERS
Pirates center fielder Felix Pie hits the wall while chasing a double hit by the Blue Jays' Adam Lind during the first inning Tuesday, March 26, 2013, in Dunedin, Fla.

Wednesday's game

twins at pirates, 1:05 p.m.

McKechnie Field, Bradenton, Fla.

Webcast: Pirates.com

Twins starter: RHP Vance Worley

Pirates starter: RHP A.J. Burnett

Tuesday's result

blue jays 6, pirates 3

Braves starter: LHP Ricky Romero 4.1 IP, 6 H, 2 ER, 3 BB, 2 SO

Pirates starter: LHP Jonathan Sanchez 4.2 IP, 7 H, 4 ER, 1 BB, 6 SO, 1 HBP

Run it down: Felix Pie covered almost all of CF on the run as he fought the sun and a stiff wind to snag Adam Lind's blooper.

He'll take it:Sanchez doubled leading off the fourth and went to third when Starling Marte reached on a two-out error. Marte was picked off first, but stayed in a rundown long enough for Sanchez to score.

Stock up: Michael McKenry extended his hitting streak to five games with an RBI single in the third inning.

Stock down: Clutch hitting. The Pirates went 1 for 11 with runners in scoring position.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.