Stats corner: Cole among best debuts for Bucs
Gerrit Cole's big league debut on Tuesday made PNC Park the nexus of baseball activity, attracting national media pundits and 30,000-plus fans to scrutinize the former No. 1 overall pick's every move. If anything, though, the hype didn't do Cole justice.
Nobody said he could hit, too.
Cole surrendered two runs in 61⁄3 innings, topping out at 99 mph on the radar gun and retiring 13 consecutive Giants hitters at one point. The 22-year-old also bested two-time Cy Young Award winner Tim Lincecum at the dish, collecting two RBI by punching a fastball into right field with the bases loaded.
Few Pirates pitchers have ever enjoyed a better first major league start as measured by Win Probability Added (WPA), which estimates how much a player increases his team's chances of victory on a per-play basis. For example, players get ample credit for driving in runs with the bases loaded or escaping bases-loaded pitching jams because those plays greatly increase their club's chances of winning. The higher the WPA, the more praise a player deserves.
Cole's contributions on the mound and in the batter's box add up to the fifth-highest WPA ever for a Bucs pitcher making his first big league start. Rick Reed takes top honors, blanking a juggernaut Mets lineup over eight innings in 1988.
Impressive Piratesin 1st MLB start
Pitcher Date/Opp. Total WPA
Rick Reed 8/8/88 vs. Mets .478
Lee Tunnell 9/4/82 vs. Dodgers .440
Tim Wakefield 7/31⁄92 vs. Cards .417
Larry Foss 9/18/61 vs. Cards .364
Gerrit Cole 6⁄11/13 vs. Giants .342
Cole produced in more pressure-packed situations during his first MLB start than other recent No. 1 overall pitching selections, including Stephen Strasburg (.076), David Price, (-.033) Luke Hochevar (-.059) and Pittsburgh's top pick in 2002, Bryan Bullington (-.35).
David Golebiewski is a freelance writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pirates likely to seek pitcher, catcher when free agency starts
- Pirates must weigh risk, reward in attempt to sign Martin
- Pirates will implement price increase for 2015 tickets
- Pirates acquire infielder from Indians, designate Axford, Gomez for assignment