Pirates add metal-detecting screeners at PNC Park
The Pirates resumed using metal-detecting wands to screen fans entering PNC Park on Wednesday, one night after the new procedure resulted in significant delays getting into the park.
In an effort to reduce fans' wait times, the team increased the number of staffers using wands and entry corrals to organize the lines, though it was unclear how many more staffers and corrals were employed.
The team abandoned the wanding plan Tuesday after lines wrapped around the ballpark even after the game had started. Pirates president Frank Coonelly issued a statement apologizing for the situation and echoed that sentiment in another statement Wednesday.
“While we expected to experience some growing pains in implementing the use of metal detecting wands at the gates, the experience (Tuesday) night was unacceptable,” Coonelly said. “That cannot and will not happen again.”
Pirates spokesman Brian Warecki said there were a number of issues that led to the backup.
“As such, we have made adjustments to our staffing, gate access points and procedures to ensure that our fans do not experience the type of lines that they encountered (Tuesday),” he said.
The Pirates encouraged fans to leave unnecessary bags and metal objects at home or in their cars and to hold their keys, cell phones and any other metal objects in their hands as they approach the screeners.
They also asked that fans allow additional time when coming to the game.
Karen Price is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach her at email@example.com or via Twitter @KarenPrice_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.