Pirates come to terms with 1st-round pick Meadows
Grayson's Austin Meadows was selected ninth by the Pirates in the MLB draft Thursday, June 6, 2013.
Photo by Courtesy gwinnettdailypost.com
The Pirates have reached an agreement with prep outfielder Austin Meadows, the ninth overall pick in the Major League Baseball draft, according to a source.
Meadows has reached a deal for near slot value for the pick, which is $3.03 million.
Meadows posted on his Twitter account Thursday evening that he was in Pittsburgh. The 6-foot-4 left-handed hitter will take a physical Friday before signing.
The Pirates agreed to a contract with their second first-round pick, prep catcher Reese McGuire, earlier this month.
The Pirates received the ninth overall pick as compensation for failing to sign last year's first-round pick, Stanford pitcher Mark Appel. Appel went No. 1 overall to Houston earlier this month.
Meadows is a five-tool outfield prospect who MLB Network analyst John Hart compared to Reds outfielder Jay Bruce. Meadows hit .535 with four homers for Grayson (Ga.) High this spring. He went to the same high school as the nation's No. 1 overall football prospect, Robert Nkemdiche, who signed with Ole Miss. Meadows is from Loganville, Ga., the same hometown as Clint Frazier, the No. 5 overall pick in the draft.
Meadows had committed to Clemson.
Meadows was the first first-round high school position player drafted by the Pirates since Andrew McCutchen in 2005.
Travis Sawchik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @Sawchik_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.