ShareThis Page

Improved baserunning contributes to Pirates' success

| Wednesday, July 17, 2013, 10:42 p.m.
Getty Images
The Pirates' Andrew McCutchen steals second base under the tag from the American League's J.J. Hardy of the Orioles during the 84th MLB All-Star Game on Tuesday, July 16, 2013 at Citi Field in New York.

Which of the following baserunners would you rather have on your team?

• Player A stole 23 bases in 33 attempts, a 70-percent success rate, and was picked off four times over 158 games. While on base, he took an extra bag on a single or two extra on a double 38 percent of the time and scored from second on a single 76 percent of the time.

• Player B stole 20 bases in 25 attempts, an 80-percent clip, and was picked off once over 90 games. His extra-bases-taken percentage was 69, and he crossed home from second on singles 87 percent of time.

Player A is Andrew McCutchen in 2011. Player B is Andrew McCutchen in 2013, and, yeah, he'd rather have Player B, too. That's why the Pirates' center fielder has put time into the subtleties of rounding the diamond to supplement his trademark speed.

“It's just about studying the game, studying the pitcher,” McCutchen said. “It's the biggest key.”

McCutchen's growth is part of a team-wide trend of improved baserunning that's seen the Pirates' National League ranking rise from 12th in stolen-base percentage and 14th in extra-bases-taken percentage in 2011 to fourth and third in those categories, respectively, in 2013.

Manager Clint Hurdle said first-base coach Rick Sofield has challenged players to get out of their comfort zones this season.

McCutchen and teammate Starling Marte, who's taken 18 percent more bases and converted 3 percent more steal attempts in higher volume than his rookie year, have been two of the biggest success stories, which Hurdle attributes to focus on the finer points over relying simply on their blazing speed.

“They've both worked very hard on their turns and their cuts around bases,” Hurdle said. “They've both worked extremely hard on their first-step quickness and crossover quickness. Secondary leads are just as important, and they've paid great attention to that, so there's a lot of ways (they've improved).”

But the team is better, too, which has translated not only into moving more runners up but getting them home.

The Pirates are scoring from second on singles 65 percent of the time this season compared to 59 percent in 2011. They're also getting home from first on doubles 50 percent of the time compared to 33 percent two years ago.

The improvement hasn't been limited to the times the Pirates have pushed opponents with the running game. They've also scaled back their caught stealing numbers and are on pace to cut down their times picked off by almost a third.

“If you don't get a good jump, don't go,” McCutchen said. “You don't always have to go.”

That's the type of cool Sofield likes to see. And as the Pirates move forward, his biggest emphasis is on runners seeing the right moves for given situations and not so much being aggressive or conservative for the sake of either.

Whether its studying opposing pitchers' tendencies to see chances to run or knowing when to not run into outs, he thinks it's all part of keeping runners' numbers going in the right direction, even if hitters sometime struggle.

“I think what they're learning more than anything is to relax in those spots,” Sofield said. “They recognize opportunities to be aggressive, they recognize opportunities when they've got to play the scoreboard, and we're running the bases well.”

Adam Bittner is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.