Share This Page

Scouting Sunday's Pirates-Rockies game

| Saturday, Aug. 10, 2013, 10:43 p.m.

Going on the disabled list cleared up second baseman Neil Walker's sore right oblique. It helped his bat get healthy, too. Entering Saturday night, in 17 games since coming off the DL on July 23, Walker has hit .328 (19 for 58) with seven doubles, seven RBI and 13 runs scored. In 23 career games against the Rockies, Walker was batting .284 with a .761 OPS. At Coors Field, he had a .325 batting average and an .861 OPS.

• Shortstop Jordy Mercer is batting .340 (17 for 50) since the All-Star break. Perhaps Mercer is responding to a challenge from veteran Clint Barmes, who heated up at the plate and got more playing time while Walker was on the DL. Mercer has started 38 games at short and 19 at second. He's batting .337 with runners on base and .330 in the No. 2 spot in the lineup. In 32 road games this year, Mercer owns a .315 average.

The Buzz

With the Rockies reeling from a 1-9 road trip, manager Walt Weiss called a team meeting Friday before their game against the Pirates. Whatever he said worked as the Rockies rolled to a 10-1 victory. “Sometimes you need somebody to talk to your face and tell you what is good and what is bad,” catcher Wilson Rosario said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.