ShareThis Page

Alvarez going deep, making outs at historic clip

| Saturday, Sept. 21, 2013, 11:00 p.m.

Pedro Alvarez has unlocked his game-changing power over the past two years, becoming the first Pirate to hit 30 home runs in back-to-back seasons since Jason Bay (2005-06) and the first third baseman in franchise history to accomplish the feat.

When it comes to working the count and avoiding outs, however, the 26-year-old has regressed.

Alvarez is drawing fewer walks this season (8.1 percent of his plate appearances entering Saturday's game) than in 2012 (9.7 percent) while still punching out at one of the highest rates in the game (30.9 percent, up slightly from 30.7 percent last season). As a result, his on-base percentage has nosedived from .317 in 2012 to just .294 in 2013, 10th-worst among qualified major league hitters.

While Alvarez has gone deep 34 times, trailing only Arizona's Paul Goldschmidt among National League batters, he's hitting for power in an all-or-nothing, Dave Kingman-esque style. He has the sixth-lowest on-base percentage (OBP) ever among NL players hitting at least 30 home runs in a season.

Selling out for power

Batter Year HR OBP

Tony Batista 2004 32 .272

Dave Kingman 1975 36 .284

Dave Kingman 1982 37 .285

Dave Kingman 1976 37 .286

Ernie Banks 1968 32 .287

Pedro Alvarez 2013 34 .294

Chris Young 2007 32 .295

Lee May 1970 34 .297

Jeromy Burnitz 2003 31 .299

Mike Jacobs 2008 32 .299


The main reason for Alvarez's low OBP this season is that he's taking a cut at more would-be balls and coming up empty more often.

His swing rate on pitches outside the strike zone (O-Swing percentage) has climbed from already-high levels in 2012, and his contact rate on chase pitches (O-Contact percentage) bests just Houston's Chris Carter (44.6 percent) and Atlanta's Dan Uggla (46.1 percent) among qualified MLB hitters.

Chasing and missing

Year O-Swing O-Contact Pct. Pct.

2012 34.0 55.6

2013 35.2 48.2

MLB Avg. 30.9 66.7


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.