ShareThis Page

Cubs could strengthen NL's toughest division in coming years

| Wednesday, Sept. 25, 2013, 10:54 p.m.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Cubs manager Dale Sveum argues with home plate umpire Scott Barry on Tuesday, Sept. 24, 2013, during a game against the Pirates at Wrigley Field in Chicago.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
The Cubs' Anthony Rizzo breaks up a double play under Pirates second baseman Neil Walker during the first inning Wednesday, Sept. 25, 2013, at Wrigley Field in Chicago.

CHICAGO — On back-to-back days earlier this week, the Braves and Pirates soaked the Wrigley Field visiting clubhouse carpet with champagne and beer in celebrating postseason berths.

On Tuesday, the Pirates sent the Cubs to a single-season, franchise-worst 50th home loss. Wrigley Field turns 100 next spring.

On Wednesday morning, Cubs manager and former Pirates player Dale Sveum was engulfed by reporters, who repeatedly asked about his future, having guided the club to 101 losses last season and 93 losses entering the series finale against the Pirates.

These are hard times within the Friendly Confines. But there's reason to believe the Cubs could soon join the Cardinals, Reds and Pirates as contenders in the NL Central, making the NL's toughest division in 2013 even stronger.

The Cubs have improved their farm system under president Theo Epstein and general manager Jed Hoyer. The Cubs rose from bottom half of baseball to 12th in organizational talent rankings, according to Baseball America and Baseball Prospectus this preseason. Baseball Prospectus lead prospect writer Jason Parks said the Cubs are “definitely now in the top five of all farm systems.”

Sveum might not be around to enjoy the farm-system's rewards, but he said help is on the way.

“If anybody pays attention, they know we are much, much healthier than we were a couple years ago,” Sveum said. “We have some outstanding (prospects). In two years, it's come a long, long way.”

• The Cubs' last three first-round picks — shortstop Javier Baez, outfielder Albert Almora and third baseman Kris Bryant — were top-10 selections and are regarded by scouts as impact prospects. Baez is a consensus top-10 prospect, having hit 37 home runs this season. Bryant was the consensus top college bat in June's draft.

• The Cubs have been the most aggressive team in the National League at signing international players, giving Cuban defector Jorge Soler a nine-year, $30 million deal last season.

• The Cubs traded ace Matt Garza at the deadline for C.J. Edwards, who has front-of-the rotation potential.

The Cubs are not alone in young talent riches in the division. On Tuesday night, Cardinals' rookie Michael Wacha was one out from throwing a no-hitter against the Nationals. On the same night, Pirates' rookie Gerrit Cole improved to 4-0 in September with a win over the Cubs.

The Pirates and Cardinals are loaded with young talent, ranked as owning top-10 farm systems by Baseball America and Baseball Prospectus. Baseball America ranked St. Louis' system as first in baseball this March. The Pirates followed at No. 7.

It all means the NL Central is already perhaps the best in the league, and soon it could become the best in baseball.

Travis Sawchik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @Sawchik_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.