Pirates notebook: Liriano's struggles continue away from PNC Park
• There's no place like home for Francisco Liriano, which makes securing home field important for the Pirates. They hold a one-game lead over the Reds for home-field advantage in the wild-card play-in game entering their key weekend series, which begins Friday in Cincinnati. Liriano left Wednesday's start at Wrigley Field with a 1.47 home ERA this season and a 4.32 road mark. For added context, his ERA is 193 percent higher on the road. For his career, Liriano has a 3.50 home ERA and a 4.83 road mark.
• Liriano allowed four runs in five-plus innings Wednesday, including a three-run home run to Darnell McDonald in what is expected to be Liriano's final regular-season start. “I don't change anything whether I'm at home or on the road,” Liriano said. “I don't try and do anything different.”
• Liriano is in line to start the Pirates' first postseason game. But perhaps Liriano's recent road woes will give Pirates manager Clint Hurdle pause if the Pirates are not at PNC Park to open the postseason.
• How much did the Pirates' miss Starling Marte's speed atop the lineup? The Pirates entered Wednesday with four steals in 10 attempts in September. Marte stole three bases Wednesday, giving him 40 this season. He is the first Pirate to reach 40 steals in a season since Tony Womack had 58 in 1998.
• Hurdle said Marte's ability to reach first base has improved: “There's been some better results, better swing paths.”
— Travis Sawchik
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.