Scouting Game 2 of the NLDS
The Tribune-Review's Travis Sawchik breaks down the Pirates' and Cardinals' projected starting lineups for Game 2 of the National League Division Series and how the players have faired against the opposing pitchers.
PIRATES' PROJECTED LINEUP
vs. LANCE LYNN
LF Starling Marte: Batting .259 entering Thursday since returning from disabled list
2B Neil Walker (S): Has found a home in No. 2 spot vs. RHP; .350 on-base percentage vs. righties
CF Andrew McCutchen: Four hits in 26 career at bats vs. Lynn; 0 walks vs. 10 strikeouts
1B Justin Morneau (L): Has never faced Lynn. Batted .282 with 15 HRs against RHP
RF Marlon Byrd: OPS dips nearly 200 points (.959 vs. .797) vs. RHP
3B Pedro Alvarez (L): Of his 36 home runs, 33 are vs. RHP
C Russell Martin: His bat has cooled in the second half, but he homered twice in the wild-card game
SS Clint Barmes: Has regained the lion's share of playing time due to defense
RHP Gerrit Cole: Rookie has not pitched against St. Louis; 1.69 ERA/10.7 K-rate in Sept.
CARDINALS' PROJECTED LINEUP
vs. GERRIT COLE
3B Matt Carpenter: Only Robinson Cano has a better WAR than Carpenter's (6.6) among 2B
RF Carlos Beltran: .315 hitter with .871 OPS vs. RHP
LF Matt Holliday: Hit 21 of his 22 home runs this year vs. RHP
1B Matt Adams: Slippery Rock University product has hit .320 with 8 HRs in filling in for injured Allen Craig
C Yadier Molina: Best offensive-defensive package at catcher in baseball
CF Jon Jay: Solid defender; .291 hitter vs. righties
3B David Freese: .345 batter in 31 career postseason games
SS Daniel Descalso: Weakest link in lineup; .238 hitter and below-average defender
RHP Lance Lynn: Allowed 10 hits and seven runs in four innings in last start vs. Pirates.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.