Share This Page

Pirates notebook: Liriano wins NL comeback player award

| Monday, Nov. 4, 2013, 10:03 p.m.

Pirates left-hander Francisco Liriano won the National League Comeback Player of the Year award — the second such honor of his career.

Liriano is the first two-time recipient of the award, which is voted upon by mlb.com writers.

Liriano previously received The Sporting News' Comeback Player of the Year.

Liriano, 30, endured a disappointing 2012 season with the Minnesota Twins and Chicago White Sox, then ran into difficulties after agreeing to a two-year, $12.75 million with the Pirates last December.

Liriano missed the first six weeks of the season, then went 16-8 with a 3.02 ERA in 26 starts. After a down season with the Minnesota Twins in 2009, Liriano was selected AL Comeback Player of the Year in 2010.

McCutchen is players' choice

Pirates center fielder Andrew McCutchen was named NL Outstanding Player of the Year at the Players Choice Awards for the second straight season.

Parker part of Hall ballot

Former Pirates right fielder Dave Parker is among 12 candidates on the Expansion Era ballot for the Hall of Fame.

The Expansion Era Committee will vote during MLB's annual winter meetings next month in Orlando, Fla. To gain induction, Parker needs support from at least 12 of the 16 voters.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.