Mazeroski family happy auction items maintain local ties
When former Pirates great Bill Mazeroski and his family decided to auction key pieces of his memorabilia from the 1960 World Series, they hoped it would be secured by a person with Pittsburgh ties.
Those wishes were fulfilled as Thomas Tull, a movie producer who owns a minority share of the Steelers, secured some of the premier pieces of the collection earlier this month.
Tull, a Binghamton N.Y., native and CEO of Legendary Pictures, spent nearly $1 million for the jersey Mazeroski wore and bat he swung in his walk-off home run in Game 7 of the 1960 World Series. The jersey commanded a price of $633,000. The total auction took in $1.7 million.
“Our hope was someone in Pittsburgh would get (the jersey and bat) and more Pittsburghers would see it,” said Bill's wife, Milene Mazeroski.
Among the other items sold were Mazeroski's spikes from Game 7 in the 1960 World Series and the six Gold Glove awards he won during his career with the Pirates, which lasted from 1956-71. He was elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame in 2001.
Milene Mazeroski said the family was not saddened to lose the memorabilia. “You can only keep so much for so long,” Milene said. “We don't have a museum to place these things in. They're just stored away. That's not right. They are things everyone should see.”
Milene Mazeroski said part of the auction earnings will go to Pirates Charities and the rest will be placed in a trust for their children and grandchildren.
“This money will never touch our hands,” she said.
Travis Sawchik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @Sawchik_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.