ShareThis Page

Cost of doing business increasing for Pirates

Rob Biertempfel
| Tuesday, Dec. 3, 2013, 10:15 p.m.
Second baseman Neil Walker was one of seven arbitration-eligible players tendered by the Pirates late Monday. Those players will head to abitration if they do not agree to contract terms by February.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Second baseman Neil Walker was one of seven arbitration-eligible players tendered by the Pirates late Monday. Those players will head to abitration if they do not agree to contract terms by February.

The Pirates have a full 40-man roster heading into the annual MLB winter meetings, which begin Monday in Orlando, Fla. The payroll for that group would come to about $70 million once all of the contracts are settled.

But things will change.

The team has glaring needs at first base and shortstop. There are questions about the starting rotation that will linger beyond spring training. And a talent upgrade in right field would be welcome, too.

The Pirates had a $75 million payroll at the end of the 2013 season, and the front office already has indicated a modest increase is expected for 2014. The club will have more cash on hand after finishing with the second-highest home attendance in franchise history and getting its share of the payout from MLB's new television deal.

The Pirates have not divulged their player acquisition budget, but considering past spending trends, it seems likely general manager Neal Huntington could have about $15 million to go shopping on the free-agent and trade markets.

Late Monday night, the Pirates tendered contracts to seven arbitration-eligible players: Charlie Morton, Travis Snider, Gaby Sanchez, Neil Walker, Pedro Alvarez, Mark Melancon and Vin Mazzaro.

Garrett Jones, Kyle McPherson and Michael McKenry were non-tendered — a formality, as all three players already had been designated for assignment.

Earlier in the day, the Pirates signed newly acquired backup catcher Chris Stewart. The Wall Street Journal reported the one-year deal is worth $1 million.

If the seven players who were tendered do not agree to contract terms before February, they will go to arbitration hearings. According to projections by, those players likely will get deals worth a total of about $20.2 million — more than doubling what those same players made in 2013.

Six players — Andrew McCutchen, Wandy Rodriguez, Jose Tabata, Jason Grilli, Francisco Liriano and Russell Martin — are under contract for 2014. Combined, they account for $41.75 million (including $5.5 million which will be paid by the Houston Astros toward Rodriguez's salary).

The Pirates also have several pre-arbitration players — guys with less than three years of service time in the majors. Those players must accept whatever salary the Pirates give them and generally make around the league minimum of $500,000.

It seems impossible Huntington could fill all of the Pirates' needs this offseason solely by signing free agents. The talent pool is thin, especially for shortstops. Also, prices are shooting high, especially for pitchers.

Having a full roster, of course, is no obstacle to adding players. If the Pirates trade prospects to get major-league help, they could clear space by dropping current 40-man players. Players who could be clinging to 40-man spots might include Snider, Jerry Sands, Ryan Reid, Andy Oliver and Chase d'Arnaud.

Rob Biertempfel is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @BiertempfelTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.