Pirates general manager Huntington is searching for right player, deal
LAKE BUENA VISTA, Fla. — Under general manager Neal Huntington, the Pirates have avoided long-term relationships with free agents. Someday, perhaps even soon, that could change.
Huntington has never given anything longer than a two-year offer to a free agent. But he said Tuesday that he came to MLB's annual winter meetings with an open mind about multiple-year contracts.
“It's just a matter of finding the right player and the right deal,” Huntington said.
The operative word is “deal.” Multi-year contracts are fine, so long as they fit into the Pirates' financial constraints. It's not an easy combination to find.
Earlier this week, there was mutual interest between the Pirates and pitcher Bronson Arroyo. However, Arroyo, who made $16.4 million this past season, reportedly is seeking a three-year contract and has fallen off the Pirates' radar.
Free-agent first baseman James Loney, who also piqued Huntington's interest, reportedly wants three years and around $30 million. Although Loney would fill the Pirates' top need, he's probably not in their plans at that price.
Loney is 29 years old and realizes this could be the final big contract of his career. Still, he might lower his demands the longer he sits on the market, which could put the Pirates back in play.
Ideally, the Pirates would like to uncover a full-time starter for first base. But they would settle for a left-handed batter to platoon with Gaby Sanchez.
“We're looking to put the best first base production together that we can,” Huntington said. “We have the luxury of Gaby, who absolutely annihilates left-handed pitching. We're just two years removed from him doing a nice job against right-handed pitching.”
As you'd expect from a lefty hitter, Loney's career stats are better when he faces right-handed pitchers. However, this past season his numbers were more similar against lefties (.299/.339/.390 in 154 at-bats) and righties (.299/.352/.446 in 395 at-bats).
Loney's superb glovework would be an asset to the Pirates, whose use of defensive shifts was a huge part of their success in 2013. Not only does Loney have great physical tools on the field, he is a savvy defender, too.
Garrett Jones was half of the Pirates' platoon last season, but he was cut earlier this month and Monday signed a free-agent deal with the Miami Marlins. Jones' arrival allows the Marlins to field trade offers for Logan Morrison.
The Pirates contacted the Marlins last week about Morrison, but a source said their interest was “mild.” It could heat up as their options dwindle.
In July, the Los Angeles Angels quietly fielded inquiries about Mark Trumbo. Although he looked to be a good fit for the Pirates, there was not enough traction to complete a deal.
Tuesday, Trumbo wound up with the Arizona Diamondbacks via a three-team trade that included the Chicago White Sox.
Kendrys Morales turned down a qualifying offer from the Seattle Mariners, which means the Pirates would have to surrender a draft pick to sign him. That's not likely to happen, as high picks are more valuable than gold in the Pirates' value-minded approach.
If the Pirates come up empty this offseason, they would have only one choice at first base on Opening Day.
“I think a lot of people are uncomfortable with Gaby as our answer, (but) we're not,” Huntington said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.