Projections forecast regression in upcoming season for Pirates
Some of baseball's top projection systems are calling for the Pirates to regress from their 2013 level of performance, which included a 94-win regular season and playoff berth.
Baseball Prospectus updated its projected 2014 standings this week and is calling for the Pirates to finish 78-84, good for fourth in National League Central.
The projection has the Pirates 10 games behind the first-place St. Louis Cardinals and also trailing the Cincinnati Reds and Milwaukee Brewers.
Baseball Prospectus has the Pirates remaining stagnant offensively, projecting them to score the fifth-fewest runs in the National League (653), and calls for the Pirates to surrender 104 more runs than they allowed last season — a jump from 577 runs allowed in 2013 to projecting 681 runs allowed in 2014.
Another prominent projection released recently is more optimistic.
Clay Davenport's 2014 projection calls for the Pirates to finish second in the NL Central and two games out of the final wild-card spot, finishing with an 83-79 mark, seven games behind the Cardinals.
The projection systems are skeptical the Pirates bullpen can repeat its 2013 performance. There's also that Francisco Liriano has struggled with consistency throughout his career and the Pirates have made few roster upgrades this offseason.
Travis Sawchik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @Sawchik_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.