Phillies, Orioles might be out of running for Burnett
The is no winner yet in the A.J. Burnett sweepstakes, but the Pirates' chances seem to have improved.
According to published reports Friday, the Baltimore Orioles and Philadelphia Phillies — considered the Pirates' main competition for Burnett — might be out of the running to sign the free agent right-hander.
A year ago during spring training, Burnett told the Tribune-Review he was considering retirement so he could spend more time with his family. He added that if he played in 2014, he would want to re-sign with the Pirates.
Burnett lives in Monkton, Md., about 28 miles north of Baltimore. However, attempts by the Orioles to lure him with a “hometown advantage” pitch might have fallen short.
Roch Kubatko of MASNsports.com, citing an anonymous source, reported Burnett has told teams he wants to stay in the National League. The Orioles remain interested in free agent pitchers Bronson Arroyo, Ubaldo Jimenez and Suk-min Yoon.
Jim Salisbury of csnphilly.com reported the Phillies also appear to be out on Burnett. General manager Ruben Amaro Jr. declined to discuss specific players but told Salisbury, “I don't suspect we'll be doing anything” in regards to signing anyone before spring training begins next week.
Pirates pitchers and catchers hold their first workouts Thursday in Bradenton, Fla.
Burnett, 37, won 26 games and posted a 3.41 ERA with the Pirates over the past two seasons. In December, the Pirates signed free agent Edinson Volquez, who last season went 9-12 with a 5.71 ERA, to a one-year, $5 million contract.
Note: The Washington Wild Things of the Frontier League sold Quincy Latimore's contract to the Pirates, Wild Things officials announced. Latimore batted .232 with six home runs, three doubles and 22 RBI in 41 games last season. The Pirates drafted him in the fourth round of the 2007 draft.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.