Prominent agent Scott Boras told the Tribune-Review on Monday he has just the fit for the Pirates.
Boras' client, Kendrys Morales, is a switch-hitting first baseman/DH who hit .277 with 23 home runs and 80 RBIs for the Seattle Mariners last season and remains on the free-agent market. The Pirates have sought to upgrade first base this offseason.
“We have the perfect fit for the Pirates,” Boras said of Morales.
Has Boras been in communication with the Pirates? “Of course,” Boras said. “The Pirates are a team where my client could play very well. ... In terms of the club wanting to know (contract terms), we've talked.”
Morales is available, along with a number of other high-profile free agents in part because they have been tagged with qualifying offers. A qualifying offer stipulates that a club signing such a free agent must surrender its first round pick if it is outside of the top-10 overall selections. The Pirates select 25th overall in the 2014 draft.
There has also been concern about the 30-year-old Morales' ability to play every day in the field; he often served as a DH with Seattle. Boras said teams are overvaluing mid-to-late first round picks and undervaluing Morales' defense.
Pirates general manager Neal Huntington declined to address whether the Pirates have interest in Morales. At the Winter Meetings, Huntington said it was unlikely the Pirates would sign a free agent tagged with a qualifying offer.
“The pick is part of the process,” Huntington wrote in a text message Monday. “But the evaluation of the player and the potential terms of the agreement are the key elements.”
The Pirates enter full-squad workouts Tuesday with Gaby Sanchez back at first and Andrew Lambo competing for at-bats in a platoon role.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.