ShareThis Page

OF prospect Polanco declines Pirates' multiyear contract offer

Rob Biertempfel
| Tuesday, May 6, 2014, 8:54 p.m.
Pirates outfielder Gregory Polanco returns to the dugout during a game against the Twins on Wednesday, March 12, 2014, at Hammond Stadium in Fort Myers, Fla.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates outfielder Gregory Polanco returns to the dugout during a game against the Twins on Wednesday, March 12, 2014, at Hammond Stadium in Fort Myers, Fla.

On Tuesday, an industry source confirmed to the Tribune-Review that top prospect Gregory Polanco rejected a multiyear contract offer from the Pirates during spring training.

Jeff Passan of Yahoo! Sports was the first to report Polanco rejected the offer, which was worth slightly less than $25 million. The deal was for seven years plus three club options that would have bought out Polanco's first three years of free agency.

Jon Heyman of reported the deal's total value would have been between $50 million and $60 million if all the options were picked up.

“As we have done in prior situations, we will refrain from commenting on any player-specific contract rumors,” Huntington said via an email released by the club.

The Pirates signed Polanco, 22, for $150,000 in April 2009 out of the Dominican Republic.

In 29 games with Triple-A Indianapolis, Polanco has hit .397 (46 for 116) with four home runs, six stolen bases and a 1.070 OPS.

Collectively, Pirates right fielders rank 10th in the National League with a .226 average and 12th with a .605 OPS. They rank 10th in stolen bases (one) and are tied for last in extra-base hits (six).

Two weeks ago, general manager Neal Huntington said Polanco is “continuing to refine some of the intricacies of his game” with Indianapolis.

It is not uncommon for teams to keep their top prospects in the minors for as long as possible to keep them from qualifying for Super 2 status, which grants an extra year of salary arbitration.

Huntington said avoiding Super 2 “is not a driving factor for us” when deciding when to promote a player to the majors for the first time.

“For us, it's about putting that player in position to be successful,” Huntington said. “It's not about graduating to the big leagues to gain experience. It's being ready to help a major league team win games.”

In his article, Passan likened Polanco's situation to that of rookie outfielder George Springer. The Houston Astros offered Springer a seven-year, $23 million contract during spring training, then sent him back to the minors after he declined.

Springer made his big league debut April 16 — 2 12 weeks into the season — which delays him from becoming a free agent by a year.

During spring training, Huntington said the Pirates are willing to offer young players and prospects multiyear deals if the conditions are right.

“We've talked repeatedly about the willingness to pursue appropriate extensions being part of our philosophy as we go forward,” Huntington said. “We'll be selective in that. You can't just go extend everybody because they don't all work, despite the myth that these are always club-friendly deals. Right situation, right player, right contract — we'll absolutely take a look at it. Who knows where we'll go with it?”

Rob Biertempfel is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @BiertempfelTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.