Dodgers lineup killing opposing pitchers softly
In the midst of a three-city, 10-game road trip, the Pirates' beleaguered pitching staff must contend with the Dodgers' high-priced — and high-powered — lineup. Los Angeles leads the National League in scoring this month and has plated the seventh-most runs in the majors in 2014.
If the Pirates are to silence the bats of Yasiel Puig, Adrian Gonzalez and Hanley Ramirez, among others, they'll have to spot their secondary pitches. No team taking swings at sea level is doing more damage against breaking and off-speed stuff.
Dodgers hitters are a collective 26 runs above average versus curveballs, sliders and changeups, trailing just the Colorado Rockies among MLB clubs. Puig (10 runs above average against non-fastballs), Ramirez (+9.1) and Gonzalez (+4.5) are throttling pitchers who serve them soft stuff. Andre Ethier (+1.4), Juan Uribe (+1.2) and Dee Gordon (+1) aren't slouches, either.
Team RAA vs. non-fastballs
Blue Jays +17.9
Pirates pitchers might be best trying to overpower L.A.'s lineup. While the Dodgers are crushing breaking and off-speed pitches, they're 25th in the majors against fastballs (-12.8 runs).
Opponents have taken notice, feeding them the game's highest rate of heaters (62.6 percent). Puig (+14 runs versus fastballs) and Matt Kemp (+4.9) won't be bothered by a fastball-first approach, but Uribe (-1.2) and Ramirez (-5.3) are scuffling.
Brandon Cumpton, Saturday's scheduled starter, could take advantage of L.A.'s fastball woes. He has tossed about 70 percent heaters during his short career with great results (six runs above average).
Friday starter Francisco Liriano (-8.8 runs) and Sunday starter Edinson Volquez (-1.2), by contrast, are getting hit hard on fastballs. Liriano will try to induce chases with his changeup (+4.2 runs), while Volquez better have his plus curveball (+2.4).
David Golebiewski is a freelance writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.