Monday's scouting report: Cubs at Pirates
Pirates beat reporter Rob Biertempfel'sinside look at Monday's game:
• In 12 career starts vs. the Pirates, Edwin Jackson is 6-2 with a 3.63 ERA, and has gotten 49 strikeouts in 69 innings. Those figures include two no-decisions and a 6.30 ERA in his first two starts this season. Over his 12-year career, Jackson has proven to be pretty durable. He's made 30 or more starts in each of the past seven seasons, one of just eight pitchers to do so. Jackson is one of just four pitches to make 30-plus starts over seven seasons by age 30 (also: Matt Cain, Felix Hernandez and Justin Verlander).
• Charlie Morton's start was pushed back a day, manager Clint Hurdle said, to let him “refine his delivery and refocus his commitment to the sinker.” Morton has been below his season-average 55 percent ground-ball rate in two of his past four starts. He's also had a BAbip in his recent outings vs. the Padres (.300), Nationals (.313), Yankees (.316) and Cardinals (.333). Last week vs. the Padres, 28 percent of Morton's pitches were curveballs, his second-highest rate all season.
Gregory Polanco went into this season with only 242 at-bats above Class A, and GM Neal Huntington wanted a larger sample size before triggering a callup. Polanco went into Sunday's action batting .350 in 243 at-bats with Triple-A Indianapolis. “In an ideal world, we'd like to get him some more plate appearances down there,” Huntington said. “What he's doing is making us feel comfortable with shortening that time frame a little bit.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.