Share This Page

Sunday's scouting report: Pirates at Marlins

| Saturday, June 14, 2014, 6:54 p.m.

• After struggling to generate swings and misses last year with the Twins — when he posted an anemic 3.9 whiff rate — Worley has demonstrated more bat-missing ability in Triple-A this season, striking out 43 in 46 innings. It's a simple formula for Worley: get ahead with the fastball and try to generate weak contact and swings and misses with his changeup.

• The Pirates are the ninth-best fastball hitting team in the majors, according to Fangraphs.com. Henderson Alvarez, like Nathan Eovaldi, who the Pirates roughed up on Friday, is a fastball-heavy pitcher. Alvarez sits in the mid 90s with both a four- and two-seam fastball. Alvarez has improved his control and is walking just 1.8 batters per nine innings, so it's perhaps a game where the Pirates will be more aggressive early in counts.

The Buzz

Nick Kingham might be the next Pirates' prospect to keep an eye on. Kingham made his first Triple-A start on Friday and struck out eight over seven shutout innings.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.