Share This Page

Wednesday's scouting report: Reds at Pirates

| Tuesday, June 17, 2014, 7:12 p.m.

X-factors

Pirates beat reporterRob Biertempfel's inside look at Wednesday's game:

• Reds closer Aroldis Chapman reached 100 mph on 15 of his first 21 pitches after coming off the disabled list May 11. He missed the start of the season after being struck in the face by a line drive in spring training. Going into this series, Chapman had retired 38 of 41 batters, including 22 in a row from May 23 to June 11. He'd made 11 straight scoreless outings.

• The Reds are getting good production from their catchers. Devin Mesoraco, Brayan Pena and Tucker Barnhart are batting a combined .268. The trio ranks second at that position with 12 home runs and fourth with a .465 slugging percentage. Mesoraco, who turns 26 Thursday, has been on the DL twice this season (hamstring, oblique).

The Buzz

Online betting site Bovada.com lists Pirates OF Gregory Polanco as a 5-to-7 favorite to win the NL Rookie of the Year Award. Other candidates are Diamondbacks SS Chris Owings (2 to 1), Reds OF Billy Hamilton (3 to 1) and Cardinals OF Oscar Tavares (20 to 1). AL frontrunners are Yankees RHP Masahiro Tanaka (2 to 5) and White Sox 1B Jose Abreu (3 to 1).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.