Share This Page

Thursday's scouting report: Mets at Pirates

| Wednesday, June 25, 2014, 8:06 p.m.

X-factors

Pirates beat reporter Rob Biertempfel'sinside look at Thursday's game:

• Per Elias, OF Kirk Nieuwenhuis is the first player in Mets history to get doubles in four consecutive at-bats — but it was even more difficult than it sounds. Nieuwenhuis doubled against the Marlins April 25 in his final at-bat before being sent to Triple-A. He was recalled Friday and got a pinch-hit double. Monday, Nieuwenhuis started and doubled in his first two at-bats. The first and last hits of the set were almost two months apart and all four came against the Marlins.

• Pirates 3B Pedro Alvarez snapped a streak of 54 plate appearances without an RBI when he hit a three-run homer Monday vs. the Rays. It was his longest drought since 2012 and four PAs shy of his career worst (58 in 2011).

The Buzz

Rays LHP David Price sure would look good fronting the Pirates' rotation, and the team has the kind of propects it would take to get him in a trade. The Pirates thought about Price last winter but decided his salary — he's making $14 million this season and could make up to $20 million next year via arbitration — is too steep.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.