Stats Corner: Morton finally taming lefty batters
When Charlie Morton unleashed his turbo sinker on the National League several years ago, he became tough on right-handed batters — and a punching bag for lefties. The Pirates starter limited righties to a .605 on-base plus slugging percentage (OPS) from 2011-13, fifth-lowest among right-handed starters facing at least 500 same-side batters over that time frame. But left-handers pummeled him for an .885 OPS, third-highest among right-handed starters.
Morton is still suffocating righties in 2014 (a .664 opponent OPS entering his start Saturday), but he's also exacting revenge on left-handers. He's holding them to a .617 OPS, a mark bested only by NL right-handers Johnny Cueto (.542), Julio Teheran (.575), Tyson Ross (.592), Adam Wainwright (.594), Tom Koehler (.606) and Stephen Strasburg (.615).
With a full year of pitching under his belt since returning from Tommy John surgery, Morton is hitting his spots much more often versus lefties.
Right on spot
Here is Morton's strike percentage against left-handed batters
Pitch 2013 2014
Sinker 62.8 64.0
Curveball 55.1 67.2
Changeup 48.3 54.5
Source: Texas Leaguers
Lefties are taking lots of cuts against Morton's curve. But the approach isn't paying off: left-handed hitters are a combined 7 for 62 (.113) versus the pitch.
Few right-handed Pirates starters have ever shut down lefties like Morton is in 2014. Steve Blass (.560 OPS in '70), Tim Wakefield (.564 in '92), Don Robinson (.592 in '78), Rick Rueschel (.594 in '85), Rick Rhoden (.596 in '86), Dock Ellis (.611 in '71), Gerrit Cole (.611 in '13) and Doug Drabek (.616 in '88) are the only righties in Bucs history to post a lower single-season OPS versus left-handed batters (minimum 200 faced).
David Golebiewski is a freelance writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.