ShareThis Page

Pirates notebook: Hurdle, Huntington on same page

| Sunday, July 27, 2014, 7:00 p.m.

DENVER — Pirates general manager Neal Huntington vowed last Sunday he would not trade too much of the Pirates' promising future for two months of upgrades in 2014.

General managers have to balance a club's long-term prospects along with today's opportunities at the trade deadline. But does Pirates manager Clint Hurdle share the same opinion? From the manager's seat, does he view opportunity differently? Is he pushing for more help to improve a team that entered Sunday four games behind Milwaukee in the division and a 1 12 games behind Atlanta for the final wild-card spot?

“I'm with Neal. The fact of the matter is (the front office) is much more educated on the level and quality of prospects than I am. There is a lot of trust involved,” Hurdle said. “You start talking about moving three or four prospects in your top 10, 15? That can get a little dicey. What can help now versus hamstring you later?”

Hurdle had a 20-minute, closed-door phone conversation with Huntington before Sunday's series finale in Colorado. Hurdle indicated there are a number of different scenarios being discussed before Thursday's trade deadline. Hurdle also noted it continues to be a seller's market, with so many teams in contention because of the second wild card and so few impact pieces available.

“We are very like-minded in understanding the industry, understanding supply versus demand,” Hurdle said. “As you go through scenarios we are revisiting now and you look at trades that have happened, every trade that happens dominoes into the next. (Teams) feel like they have a better player than the one traded. They need a bigger deal in the eyes of whoever it might be, ownership, public opinion.”

Hurdle noted that Huntington has been aggressive around the three previous trade deadlines. He acquired Derrek Lee and Ryan Ludwick in 2011, Travis Snider and Gaby Sanchez in 2012 and Justin Morneau and Marlon Byrd last season.

“I think if you look at our track record, (Huntington) has been aggressive and tried to find fits for the needs we've had over the last three times,” Hurdle said.

The Pirates have been linked to a number of starting pitchers and bullpen arms including, recently, Red Sox left-hander Andrew Miller.

Does Hurdle have many needs on his wish list like he did a year ago?

“I think we are looking at a couple specific areas,” Hurdle said. “It could be the same number (of needs), just different areas.”

Marte's symptoms linger

Starling Marte still has concussion symptoms, and he might not be ready to return when he's eligible to come off the seven-day concussion DL on Wednesday.

The Pirates have missed Marte's bat against the Rockies' left-handed starters.

“We have to wait until he doesn't feel any more of the tension and pressure he has felt,” Hurdle said. “Until that happens, we'll have him continue to do some cardiovascular work.”

Polanco on struggles

Gregory Polanco was batting .137 against lefties this season, and his overall batting line had fallen to .247 entering Sunday. Polanco said every season contains ups and downs but he also said opponents have made adjustments.

“They are pitching different now,” Polanco said. “They throw a lot outside-inside, inside-outside, they don't throw right down the middle. … I'm just trying to stay with my approach.”

Alvarez back in lineup

Pedro Alvarez returned to the starting lineup against Rockies lefty Franklin Morales on Sunday. Alvarez had sat out the Pirates' past three games and the last three against left-handed starters.

Travis Sawchik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @Sawchik_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.