Share This Page

Tuesday's scouting report: Pirates at Giants

| Tuesday, July 29, 2014, 12:01 a.m.

X-factors

Pirates beat reporterRob Biertempfel's inside look at Tuesday's game:

• Going into Monday's late game, the Giants had gotten just one extra base hit — Buster Posey's solo home run Sunday off Hyun-Jin Ryu — since the ninth inning of Wednesday's game against the Phillies. The three-game stretch without an extra-base hit was San Francisco's longest since May 30-June 1, 2002. The Giants have not gone four straight games without an extra-base hit since May 6-10, 1978. ... The Giants have won six of their past seven games when they hit at least one home run.

• Pirates catchers have caught 11 would-be base-stealers this season, which ties them with the Giants for the most in the majors. Overall, the Pirates have racked up 33 caught stealings, which ranks first in the NL and second in the majors behind the Tigers (34).

The Buzz

Wabash Valley College coach Rob Fournier told the Daily Republican Register of Mt. Carmel, Ill., that the Pirates “offered top-10 (round) money” to 33rd-round pick Zach Lewis. Fournier said the club was willing to pay a penalty to sign Lewis for an over-slot bonus. However, Lewis, a right-handed pitcher, opted to return to school for his sophomore season.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.