Stats Corner: Can Pirates' Polanco handle the heat in season's final weeks?
So maybe Gregory Polanco isn't Yasiel Puig — at least not yet. The prized rookie thrashed Triple-A pitching (a .945 on-base plus slugging percentage) and got off to a similar start in the majors, but a prolonged slump has dropped his OPS to .665. That's more than 50 points below the MLB average (.720) for right fielders in 2014.
Polanco isn't struggling in a way that you might expect from a 22-year-old with scant experience at the upper levels of the minors. Instead of swinging wildly or whiffing at breaking and off-speed pitches, Polanco is having difficulty squaring up major league fastballs.
Polanco is displaying a sharp eye at the plate, chasing fewer pitches outside of the strike zone (29.6 percent) than the MLB average (31 percent). He's also crushing breaking pitches, with an above-average run value per 100 pitches seen against curveballs (+2.03) and sliders (+0.2). But against fastballs, Polanco has the fifth-worst run value among 22 rookies logging at least 250 plate appearances.
Batter Team FB Run value
Kolten Wong Cardinals -1.10
Travis d'Arnaud Mets -0.91
Robinson Chirinos Rangers -0.80
Jonathan Schoop Orioles -0.80
Gregory Polanco Pirates -0.48
The Bucs' top prospect laid waste to pitchers who fed him breaking pitches early on, but now they're challenging him with heat. Polanco saw fastballs 55.6 percent of the time in June, but that increased to 59.3 percent in July and 64.3 percent so far in August.
Polanco isn't a Rookie of the Year candidate, but there's still reason to think he'll help the Pirates down the stretch. Polanco is projected for a .751 OPS during the rest of the season according to Oliver, a forecast system available on Fangraphs. That's well above Travis Snider's .687 projection, despite his recent hot hitting.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.