Veteran announcers are finalists for Pirates' play-by-play position
Veteran broadcaster Andy Masur, who lists two major league clubs on his resume, appears to be a finalist for the job in the Pirates' radio/TV booth, industry sources told the Tribune-Review.
Tom Hart, who works for ESPN and the SEC Network, also has interviewed for the job. Hart was the play-by-play announcer for the Tennessee Smokies, the St. Louis Cardinals Double-A affiliate, from 2002-06.
Hart twice was named Southern League Broadcaster of the Year. He also has worked for Fox Sports Radio and Fox Sports South.
Masur, 48, has 16 years' experience broadcasting games for the Chicago Cubs and San Diego Padres and also has covered college basketball.
He was the secondary announcer for Padres telecasts on Fox Sports San Diego in 2012-13 but was released before the 2014 season. Masur also did radio play-by-play for the Padres and University of San Diego men's basketball.
Masur worked as a sports anchor and reporter for several radio outlets in Chicago in the late-1990s. In 1999, he hosted the Cubs' pre- and post-game shows on WGN Radio. Masur also occasionally filled in for Cubs play-by-play man Pat Hughes.
Masur has interviewed recently with teams such as the New York Mets and Arizona Diamondbacks.
The Pirates had more than 200 applicants for the position that opened in December when Tim Neverett left to work for the Boston Red Sox. The field of candidates has narrowed, and a decision could be made by the first week of February.
Joe Block, who has called Milwaukee Brewers games the past four years, also has gotten an interview.
Rob Biertempfel is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @BiertempfelTrib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.