Brewers smack five home runs at home in victory over Pirates
MILWAUKEE — To find out what it's like to play for the Pirates at Miller Park, Wandy Rodriguez could have shoved bamboo shoots under his fingernails. Or stepped on a thumbtack. Or stuck his head in a bee's nest.
Instead, Rodriguez went out to the mound and pitched. Ouch!
The Milwaukee Brewers smacked five home runs Monday, three of them off Rodriguez, and crushed the Pirates, 10-4. The Brewers also tallied three triples and a double in their 12-hit attack.
Since 2007, the Brewers are 45-7 against the Pirates at Miller Park. According to Elias Sports Bureau, that's the best record by one team at home against a division opponent in that span.
The Brewers have won eight straight games (home and away) against the Pirates. Going back to 2007, Milwaukee holds a 70-24 advantage, which is — you guessed it — the best record by one team against a division foe in that period.
“We've talked about it internally,” Pirates manager Clint Hurdle said. “It's not so much we need to do something different. We need to play good baseball against these guys. That's what we've not done consistently well.”
Even before he joined the Pirates last July, Rodriguez struggled at Miller Park. In 12 starts for the Astros, Rodriguez went 3-7 with a 5.88 ERA and a 1.66 WHIP. On Monday, he lasted 3 2⁄3 innings and gave up seven runs and six hits.
Rob Biertempfel is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @BiertempfelTrib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.