Pirates can't overcome Liriano's shaky start in 6-3 loss to Giants
SAN FRANCISCO — Pirates starter Francisco Liriano might be voted NL Comeback Player of the Year. It has been his year, from being plucked from the free-agent bargain bin to possibly garnering some Cy Young Award votes.
But Saturday was not Liriano's night, as he struggled in a 6-3 loss to the Giants.
To keep sole possession of first place in the NL Central on Saturday — the Cardinals beat the Braves, 6-2, earlier in the day — the Pirates needed a productive and efficient night from Liriano.
Instead, Liriano (14-6), who was seeking a career-best 15th win, struggled for the second time in his past four starts. He required 102 pitches to get through four innings.
“I was missing my spots,” Liriano said. “I was also making some good pitches they found a way to get them in play.”
Liriano did not have the same command or quality of stuff as he had in his last start in San Diego, when he struck out 13 Padres. As a result, Pirates will enter Sunday tied with the Cardinals for first place. The Reds are 2½ games back.
Liriano was not sharp, but he was not hit as hard as his pitching line of four runs and nine hits in four innings suggests. He allowed all four runs in the first.
Buster Posey's broken-bat, RBI single sent a shard of barrel in the general direction of Pedro Alvarez and perhaps prevented Alvarez from fielding the soft liner. The hit scored Marco Scutaro.
Brett Pill followed with a dribbler to Alvarez that resulted in an RBI infield single, scoring Joaquin Arias, who reached on a double down the right-field line — a flyball that appeared to land foul.
Pablo Sandoval followed with an RBI groundout, scoring Posey to give the Giants a 3-0 lead. Hector Sanchez slapped a Liriano pitch the other way to give the Giants four runs in the inning.
By the time Liriano struck out Tim Lincecum to end the first, the Giants had batted around and Liriano had thrown 38 pitches.
“It's one of those innings,” Pirates manager Clint Hurdle said. “He wasn't sharp. He was out of rhythm.”
Like Liriano, Lincecum has been searching to regain his elite form over the past several seasons. A decline in velocity has correlated with a rising ERA.
But Lincecum was in control for the first four innings. He located his fastball well and had a fall-off-the-table changeup. He struck out the Pirates in order in the second and allowed just one hit and two walks over the first four innings.
Lincecum baffled the Pirates until the fifth, when rookie catcher Tony Sanchez turned around a 90-mph fastball for his first career home run and cut the Giants' lead to 5-1.
A fan threw a ball back onto the field, but it wasn't the home run ball, rather a Pony League ball. So as of Saturday night, Tony Sanchez was without a meaningful piece of personal memorabilia.
“My first home run ball is in someone's house,” Sanchez said.
Lincecum walked Andrew McCutchen and allowed a double to Alvarez in the sixth before being pulled to a standing ovation by a sellout crowd at AT&T Park.
Lincecum's final line — 5 1⁄3 innings, three runs, three hits, four walks, eight strikeouts — was tarnished by the Giants' bullpen, which gave up back-to-back RBI hits to Gaby Sanchez and Tony Sanchez.
The Giants added two runs by taking advantage of ineffective pitching from Pirates middle relievers Jared Hughes and Vin Mazzaro.
The Pirates' last, best threat came in the eighth. With runners on second and third, the Giants summoned left-hander Javier Lopez to face Alvarez with two on. Alvarez, who has a career .207 batting average against lefties, struck out on four pitches.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Banged-up Steelers can clinch with win over Chiefs
- Wood Center at IUP turns campus trees into art
- Starkey: Chryst a miserable failure at Pitt
- Ex-Penguins defenseman Niskanen still miffed by coaches’ firings
- Pitt football fights to overcome steppingstone status
- Muhammad Ali hospitalized with pneumonia
- Pouliot scores in NHL debut as Penguins tame Panthers
- Pitt players support Rudolph for job
- U.S. coal mines nearing record low in worker deaths
- Police investigate alleged institutional sexual assault
- New York farmers lament lost opportunity for gas riches