Pirates' four-game winning streak snapped in 5-2 loss to Nationals
Denard Span of the Washington Nationals stood in the batter's box Sunday and hacked away at Francisco Liriano's confidence.
Leading off the fourth inning, Span dueled the Pirates left-hander in an 11-pitch at-bat. Span fouled off five pitches from Liriano — four sliders and a sinker — then pulled a single into right field.
Span soon scored, and the Nationals cruised to 5-2 victory, which snapped the Pirates' four-game winning streak.
Liriano (0-5) scuffled again and is winless in 11 starts this season. In five innings, he yielded four runs on five hits and four walks.
Over 26 starts last season, Liriano's ERA never rose above 3.02. It now stands at 5.06, the highest it has been since the 2012 season.
“I'm not doing my job,” Liriano said. “I'm missing pitches. It's frustrating. It's hard. I'm not keeping the team in ballgames.”
A left-handed batter, Span went 2 for 3 and scored two runs against Liriano. That's symbolic of Liriano's season so far — a year ago, he dominated lefties.
In 2013, Liriano held left-handed batters to a .131 average and a .321 on-base plus slugging percentage. He struck them out 27 percent of the time. This year, lefties are batting .289 against him.
“My two-seamer isn't sinking,” Liriano said. “It's cutting back to (the) middle sometimes. That's the problem I'm having.”
In the first inning, Span lashed the second pitch of the game — a two-seamer — past first baseman Ike Davis for a double. Anthony Rendon walked on four pitches.
With two outs and runners on second and third, Liriano bounced a slider a couple of feet in front of the plate. Span scored on the wild pitch. Ian Desmond's single to right field drove in Rendon to make it 2-0.
There was another gift run from Liriano in the Nationals' two-run fifth inning. Span again led off and capped his 11-pitch at-bat with a single.
“I think I made some great pitches to him, but he kept fouling them off,” Liriano said. “He's a great hitter. He won the fight.”
Rendon tripled off the wall in right-center to score Span. Right fielder Josh Harrison crashed into the padded wall and was stunned for a couple of seconds, but he stayed in the game.
With lefty hitter Adam LaRoche at the plate, Liriano threw another wild pitch and Rendon scored.
“When men get on base, (Liriano) seems to have a little rush (to his delivery),” manager Clint Hurdle said. “He's aware of it. He's trying to find a way to slow it down and focus on making the next good pitch. That hasn't happened with enough consistency.”
Of the 98 pitches Liriano threw in the game, 39 came in the fifth inning.
Nationals right-hander Doug Fister (2-1) didn't encounter much turbulence over the first five innings. The Pirates had three hits, all singles, in that span, but only one runner reached second base.
In the sixth, Harrison popped a solo home run into the Nationals' bullpen. Walker pulled a single on the ground into right field. Andrew McCutchen reached on a fielder's choice. Davis slapped a single to left.
Craig Stammen relieved Fister and got out of the jam with one pitch. Starling Marte grounded into a 5-3 double play.
“Stammen's a sinkerballer and has the ability to get a double-play,” Nationals manager Matt Williams said. “Marte had seen Doug a couple of times, so we wanted to give him a little different look (with Stammen). It worked good.”
The Pirates scored a run in the eighth but blew a chance for a big inning. McCutchen and Marte each struck out with runners on first and third.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.