Pirates lose series opener to Cubs, 6-3
CHICAGO — Starlin Castro is locked in on Pirates right-hander Charlie Morton.
Castro's three-run homer in the third inning Friday was the decisive blow in the Chicago Cubs' 6-3 win over the Pirates.
This is Morton's seventh year in the majors, but Castro is the only batter with three career homers off him. All three home runs came in a span of 10 at-bats this season.
“I've only given up six home runs this year, and three of them have been to him,” Morton said. “He's hit me tough.”
In his career, Castro is batting .444 (12 for 27) against Morton. On April 8, Castro smacked a three-run homer and a solo shot off him.
“One was a four-seamer that was up-up,” Morton said. “The other was a curveball that I hung. The one today was probably the best location and the best pitch of those three, but he still hit it.”
Morton (4-8) pitched six innings and allowed a season-high six runs and eight hits. It was the most earned runs Morton had allowed in a start since giving up six against the Philadelphia Phillies on July 29, 2011.
“He gave us volume and length, which we sorely needed, pitching almost 13 innings out of the bullpen the last two days,” manager Clint Hurdle said.
Cubs starter Edwin Jackson (5-7) served up Jordy Mercer's home run in the fifth. The Pirates managed just two hits, both infield singles, over the final four innings.
The controversial Experimental Rule 7.13 kicked the Pirates in the teeth again in the second inning.
With two outs and Ike Davis on second base, Pedro Alvarez hit a line-drive single. Right fielder Nate Schierholtz played the ball on one hop and fired it to the cutoff man, first baseman Anthony Rizzo.
Third base coach Nick Leyva wisely stopped Davis at third. But Alvarez made a wide turn toward second and was stunned to see Rizzo holding the ball. With Alvarez in a rundown, Davis broke for home.
Camped in front of the plate, catcher John Baker got the ball and tagged Davis out. The Pirates argued that Baker illegally blocked the plate and the umpires agreed to a second look. After a 2 1⁄2-minute review, the MLB control center upheld the out call.
Did Davis see any part of home plate as he ran toward Baker?
“I could see it behind him,” Davis said, laughing. “He never moved. He stood in the line the whole time, caught it, then dropped a knee. He never gave me a (lane). I just don't understand the rule. I don't think anyone does anymore.”
Morton wrestled a bit with his control and with plate umpire Bob Davidson's strike zone in the third inning. The Cubs parlayed that into a 5-0 lead.
With one out, Jackson and Luis Valbuena hit back-to-back singles. Morton got ahead 0-2 against Chris Coghlan, then missed with a couple of borderline pitches. Coghlan walked, loading the bases.
Rizzo lashed a two-run double on a 2-2 curveball.
With an 0-2 count to Castro, Morton tried another curveball. Castro sent it into the left-field bleachers.
“I'd like to have that ball down a little bit more,” Morton said. “I don't think it was a bad pitch, but it was a bad pitch to him in that situation. With two strikes, I've got to bury it.”
Jackson walked the first two batters in the fifth, Josh Harrison and Alvarez, on eight pitches. Facing Jordy Mercer, Jackson switched to sliders. Mercer pounced on a 2-2 slider and smacked a three-run homer to left.
“When I've faced him before, he's thrown a lot of sliders,” Mercer said. “So, I went up there thinking to look for a slider. It was his best pitch today, and he threw it a lot.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Steelers’ defense unfazed by noise, believes in potential
- Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh asking Supreme Court to hear case
- Penguins notebook: After reinterpreting rule, draft pick sought for Bylsma’s hiring
- Pirates pound Padres for 7th consecutive victory
- Overhaul possible for West Mifflin’s Century III Mall
- Man dies in North Buffalo fire
- Phone threats put scare into international flights
- Kiski River search finds kayak but no kayaker
- Juvenile status hearing, trial delayed in Franklin Regional stabbings
- Former Ford City superintendent charged with killing family member in Texas
- Ice Miners not returning to Connellsville