AFL players score hefty raise in new CBA
Consol Energy Center was mostly empty when the Power played the Mustangs on Saturday, June 16, 2012. Chaz Palla/Tribune-Review)
Most Arena Football League players will receive significant game-day raises eventually reaching 131 percent under the new five-year collective bargaining agreement, according to documents obtained by the Tribune-Review.
Game salaries will increase from $400 to $830 starting next season and will top out at $925 in 2017, the final year of the deal.
But starting quarterbacks will lose 85 percent of their per-game bonus, which will drop from $1,675 to $250 next year. Such bonuses will increase to $350 by the end of the contract.
A new feature of the CBA will let teams offer players multiyear contracts that include roster bonuses of $750 per season on two-year deals and $1,000 per season on three-year contracts.
Players, who currently live for free in housing provided by the teams, will lose that privilege and have the option to pay $150 per player per week per room — based on single occupancy. Team-provided housing will include furniture and utilities.
Other features of the CBA:
• Reducing the roster by one to 20 active players but adding an inactive player for a total of four.
• $75 per week for veterans during training camp.
• $500 for travel fees when a player is traded.
• Arbitration for fines of more than $100.
• This season's pay will increase to $585, beginning with the final four games of the regular season. Starting quarterback bonuses for those games will be $1,090.
Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.