Share This Page

Power surge past VooDoo for 1st win of season

| Friday, April 19, 2013, 11:48 p.m.

Power coach Derek Stingley made major changes to his coaching staff Friday, taking face-to-face play-calling responsibilities from offensive coordinator Mike Tomczak and hiring a consultant to help with the game plan.

Change was good. The Power (1-3) produced their highest score of the season and snapped their three-game losing streak in a 46-43 victory against the New Orleans VooDoo (1-3) at New Orleans Arena.

After the Power scored only 14 points in Chicago on Sunday, Stingley hired consultant Jon Lyles, a previous coaching colleague, and all three coaches wore headphones during the game. But Stingley was on the field with quarterback Jordan Jefferson, a job previously performed by Tomczak.

Jefferson, an LSU product playing near his hometown, had his best game of the season, completing 19 of 30 passes for 223 yards and five touchdowns. With New Orleans leading, 43-33, in the third quarter, the Power seized the lead for good when P.J. Berry caught a 47-yard touchdown pass from Jefferson and later scored on a 2-yard run.

The Power rallied in the second quarter from a 23-7 deficit, forcing turnovers on three consecutive possessions, including Sergio Gilliam's 18-yard interception return for a touchdown.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.