Backup QB could help Power offense
By Jerry DiPaola
Published: Friday, May 10, 2013, 12:42 p.m.
For the second time this season, the Power are doing something about their feeble offense. This time, perhaps, the attempt will yield more positive results.
Power coach Derek Stingley, who hired offensive assistant Jon Lyles after the season's first three games, put starting quarterback Jordan Jefferson's job in jeopardy, activating Steve Sheffield, formerly of Texas Tech, for the game Saturday at the Philadelphia Soul.
Stingley wouldn't commit to inserting Sheffield into the starting lineup, but Sheffield is expected to play.
“We thought we needed an upgrade at the position, and we want to see if he can come in and help us,” Stingley said.
Sheffield, activated Thursday, spent the past few days trying to learn the Power's offense from Lyles, who has taken over many of coordinator Mike Tomczak's duties.
Stingley warned that his new quarterback is “a work in progress.”“You can't cure everything in week,” he said.
The Power had signed Sheffield to a three-year contract in November, but he chose to remain in his hometown of Lubbock, Texas, where his grandmother and father were ill.
“He was the first guy we signed in the offseason to be our quarterback,” Stingley said.
Stingley kept in contact with Sheffield, who finally agreed to come to Pittsburgh this week.
Unlike Jefferson, Sheffield has experience in indoor football, serving as a backup in Spokane and San Antonio the past two seasons. Prior to that, he had limited opportunities at Texas Tech but completed 134 of 194 attempts for 1,578 yards and 17 touchdowns during the 2009 and '10 seasons.
The Power (1-5) are last in the Arena Football League in scoring (33.8 points per game) and next to last in passing yards per game (205.8).
“We've been hot and cold,” Stingley said. “More cold than hot. We need to be steady.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.