Share This Page

Power snap losing skid, beat Soul

| Saturday, May 11, 2013, 10:11 p.m.

Everything was new for the Power on Saturday night at Wells Fargo Center in Philadelphia.

Especially the result.

New quarterback Steve Sheffield, who wasn't activated until Thursday, threw six touchdown passes to lead the previously sluggish offense to its best scoring output of the season in a 53-48 victory over the first-place Philadelphia Soul (3-4). Sheffield completed 19 of 35 passes for 272 yards.

The decisive points came on Sheffield's fourth touchdown pass to wide receiver James Robinson, an 8-yard flip with 8:04 left in the game. Robinson also was playing in his first game for the Power after coming off the injured reserve list last week. New kicker Julian Rauch added five extra points.

The Power (2-5), which scored touchdowns on four consecutive possessions in the first half, moved to within one game of first place in the Arena Football League's American Conference East.

The Power protected the lead twice in the fourth quarter when defensive lineman Curtis Young stopped Soul quarterback Dan Raudabaugh at the 1-yard-line with 2:40 left in the game, and Sergio Gilliam intercepted a pass in the end zone with 12 seconds left.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.