Power storms back to beat rival Gladiators
Power coach Derek Stingley hopes his team's 55-44 win Saturday night over the Cleveland Gladiators helps shape a new era of indoor football for the 3-year-old franchise.
“All we did was win our third game,” he said after the team rallied from a 16-point deficit to improve to 3-6 with its second victory in the past three weeks. “We expect to win many more.”
But it's the Power's new look that marked the storyline of a game played in front of an announced crowd of 5,340 at Consol Energy Center.
The victory snapped a 10-game home losing streak, dating to April 14, 2012, when the Power also rallied — from 31 points down — to beat Orlando.
More importantly, the offense has a fresh look. Three weeks after handing the starting job to quarterback Steve Sheffield, Stingley fired offensive coordinator Mike Tomczak on Friday.
He refused to comment further. But when asked if Tomczak was surprised by his ouster, Stingley said, “Very.”
Stingley had taken away Tomczak's play-calling responsibilities earlier this season. On Saturday, in his third start, Sheffield helped the Power score their most points of the season.
“There is nothing that can shock him,” Stingley said. “At practice, he coaches between plays.”
Sheffield, signed to a three-year contract, completed 18 of 30 passes for 286 yards and six touchdowns.
Sheffield, intercepted four times last week in a 62-34 loss to Tampa Bay, threw two more against the Gladiators (2-7). But he also helped the Power score 27 unanswered points in the fourth quarter.
The decisive score was a 17-yard pass to wide receiver Mike Washington with 2:03 left in the game. The Power ensured the victory when defensive back Brandon Freeman intercepted a pass and Sheffield hit Julian Talley for a 34-yard TD pass.
Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.