Power falls to San Jose, 68-54
The Power rallied in the fourth quarter Saturday night, but they couldn't stop the San Jose SaberCats when it counted, dropping a 68-54 decision at H.P. Pavilion.
The decisive score was a 6-yard touchdown pass from San Jose quarterback Mitch Mustain to former Power wide receiver Jason Willis, breaking a 54-54 tie with 12 seconds left in the game. On the next snap, San Jose's Huey Whittaker intercepted a pass from Power quarterback Derek Cassidy and returned it 5 yards for a touchdown.
The Power (3-8) forced two turnovers in the fourth quarter — a fumble recovery by defensive back Chris LeFlore and a 46-yard interception return by Sergio Gilliam with 46 seconds left that tied the score. Prior to those plays, the SaberCats (8-3) had scored on each their first eight possessions.
Cassidy completed only 19 of 41 passes for 261 yards and six touchdowns. He started in place of regular Power quarterback Steve Sheffield, who returned to his home in Texas where his father is ill.
San Jose quarterback Mitch Mustain completed 21 of 37 passes for 250 yards and six touchdowns.
After a slow start to the season, the Power has scored 53 or more points in three of its past five games. But the defense has allowed 138 during the team's current two-game losing streak.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.