Power trade record-setting WR Washington to Spokane
The Power made a dramatic move toward remaking their roster Thursday by trading record-setting wide receiver Mike Washington, their most productive player over the first three years of the franchise's existence.
Washington, a graduate of Aliquippa High School, was sent to the Spokane Shock for Arvell Nelson, who can play receiver and linebacker and back up newly acquired quarterback Tommy Grady. The Power also will receive offensive lineman Ben Ossai in the deal.
“Trading Mike was an extremely tough decision to make, but for the future of this franchise, it was what had to be done,” said coach Derek Stingley, whose team has won only nine of 36 games over the past two seasons. “We are in the process of building a team that will win, not once, but continuously.
“Mike will be missed. He is a true professional with a great approach to the game, and our organization wishes him well. With the additions of Nelson and Ossai, we are thrilled to get two players that will have an immediate impact on our team.”
Washington is the Power's all-time leading pass catcher with 365 receptions for 4,446 yards and 105 touchdowns. He holds 11 franchise records.
Nelson, 6-foot-5, 225 pounds, caught nine passes for six touchdowns and rushed for four more scores last season, his rookie year with the Shock. He also completed 16 of 20 passes for 162 yards and five touchdowns and recorded 16 tackles.
Ossai, 6-6, 315, is a three-year Arena Football League veteran who also spent part of the past two seasons with the British Columbia Lions of the Canadian Football League.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.