Share This Page

Shout it out loud: Power prepare to play LA KISS

| Friday, May 16, 2014, 10:52 p.m.
Sidney Davis | Tribune-Review
The Power's Tommy Taggert stiff-arms the Soul's Fred Shaw and picks up a first down as time during a 65-57 victory Saturday, May 3, 2014, at Consol Energy Center.
Sidney Davis | Tribune-Review
Power coach Ron James during a game against the Soul on Saturday, May 3, 2014, at the Consol Energy Center.

The Arena Football League coaches' poll is more of a source of amusement to the Power's Ron James than an irritant.

After all, he said he doesn't vote in the poll, even though he coaches one of the best teams in the league.

“I never see that information from the league (to cast his votes),” he said. “Obviously, they don't feel I'm that important out here. That's fine.”

AFL director of communications B.J. Pickard is puzzled by James' assertion, saying, “He absolutely has a vote. Every team is sent a ballot every week and required to participate.”

Whether his ballot is getting lost in the mail is of little import to James, who said coaches aren't permitted to vote for their teams, anyway. The Power were ranked No. 5 this week, behind teams they have defeated (No. 3 San Jose and No. 4 Spokane), but James simply shrugged his shoulders and went back to work.

“We don't get a lot of respect around the league,” he said of the Power, winners of two in a row and holding a 5-3 record entering their game Saturday night against the LA KISS at Consol Energy Center. “We won't until we string together some wins and make a run at something significant.

“Let them rank us where they want to rank us. Polls are nice for fans to talk about. They're nice for players to view, but for coaches they don't mean anything. It's about the work and the process and we are very much a work in progress.”

If the Power can eliminate their problems and beat the KISS (2-6), they will be 6-3 at the halfway point of the season for the first time in the franchise's four-year existence.

James said the team must improve upon its poor effort last week in a 52-41 victory at Spokane.

Noting that Veteran's Arena in Spokane is one of the toughest venues for visiting teams, James refused to accept that as an excuse.

“I thought our first half offensively was very sloppy, we played uninspired football for the first two quarters of the game and we turned the ball over twice in the second half,” he said. “The score in Spokane shouldn't have been as close as it was. I really believe our team got a wake-up call.”

The KISS got a wake-up call, too.

An expansion franchise co-owned by legendary rock artist Gene Simmons, the KISS entertain their home fans with caged pole dancers and players entering the field on elevator platforms. But after a 2-1 start, they lost five in a row.

That prompted a trade this week with Jacksonville that brought 43-year-old quarterback Aaron Garcia to an LA offense that scored 21 points against Spokane and 12 at Iowa.

Garcia has thrown for 60,471 yards and 1,310 touchdowns in a 19-year career and two years ago was named the No. 3 greatest AFL player of all time. But he was a backup in Jacksonville.

“He's been around almost since the (league) started,” James said. “You are not going to fool him with anything. He knows the game better than most coaches. It's just a matter of how effective he is going to be when he arrives with a new team.”

The KISS remain dangerous under 2013 AFL Coach of the Year Bob McMillen, who led the Chicago Rush into last year's playoffs despite shaky ownership.

Last week, the KISS lost at undefeated Cleveland, 45-42, on a walk-off field goal. This will be the KISS' second east coast trip in eight days.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.