Power facing potential scheduling conflict with ArenaBowl
TribLIVE Sports Videos
The Power could face a scheduling conflict at Consol Energy Center if they reach ArenaBowl XXVII on Aug. 23.
The Power (15-3), who open the playoffs Sunday in Orlando, Fla. would be the host team if they win the American Conference championship and the Spokane Shock, a wild-card team at 11-7, advance through the National Conference.
The problem is the P&G Gymnastics Championships are scheduled for Consol on Aug. 21-24, with afternoon and evening sessions each day.
Power co-owner Matt Shaner said he has been contact with officials from the Penguins, Arena Football and ESPN, who will televise the game on its No. 1 network. He would not be in favor of switching the venue to Spokane.
“We certainly would not defer the bowl game to the other city if we are privileged enough to make it to ArenaBowl as the higher seed,” Shaner said.
AFL spokesman B.J. Pickard said the league doesn't anticipate conflicts.
“But if we happened to run into one, the team would need to use a backup venue within their region,” he said.
Shaner said he will consider alternative sites if they are local, including playing outdoors. But he has not contacted the Steelers or Pirates about Heinz Field or PNC Park. Neither team has home games scheduled that day.
“The AFL would have to approve an outdoor game,” he said. “I believe my fellow owners would approve this if I requested it.”
Consol general manager Tim Hassett said the gymnastics show has been on his schedule for at least the past year and a half. He said Consol is available Aug. 25-26, if the AFL decides to postpone the game.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.