Analysis: Snedeker approaching elite status with recent streak
TribLIVE Sports Videos
PEBBLE BEACH, Calif. — Brandt Snedeker sat alone at the far end of a bar in Carmel called A.W. Shucks — the perfect name for an oyster bar and the perfect spot for a Tennessee golfer with a mop of strawberry blond hair and an innocent, freckled face that belies how fiercely he wants to win.
He was waiting for longtime friends from Nashville for a drink before going to dinner with his wife. No one bothered him. In this tony town packed with Hollywood heavyweights, star athletes and Fortune 500 executives during the Pebble Beach National Pro-Am, not many recognized him.
Six days later, there was no mistaking golf's hottest player.
Snedeker posed with Clint Eastwood on the 18th green at Pebble Beach, his name in the record book for the lowest score in the 76-year history of the old Crosby Clambake. The previous two weeks, he had to settle for second place behind the best players of his generation: Tiger Woods at Torrey Pines, Phil Mickelson in Phoenix.
A two-shot win at Pebble Beach doesn't put him in their league. But he's headed in that direction.
Snedeker had said a week earlier at the Phoenix Open that elite players are defined by winning, especially majors, and “I haven't done nearly enough of that.”
“I'm playing great right now,” he said. “I'm as high as I've ever been in the world ranking and that kind of stuff, but you have to win tournaments to validate that,” he said. “I haven't done it.”
Pebble Beach was only his fifth career win, and Snedeker is not the first player to go on a big run. Remember, Jason Dufner had a stretch last spring when he won twice and was runner-up in four tournaments. But there's an explosiveness about Snedeker, not to mention that putting stroke, which makes his goal of being the best a little more plausible.
“Brandt, great performance. Wish I had your putting stroke again,” Tom Watson tweeted Sunday night.
In the last two years, only three players have won at least four times on the PGA Tour: Rory McIlroy with five, Snedeker and Woods with four.
Validation comes from winning.
Snedeker now is No. 4 in the world, and he said he would like to be known as the best American golfer. He believes he can be No. 1, no small task with McIlroy at the top and Woods getting closer than ever to a return to his full form.
The signature win for Snedeker remains the Tour Championship six months ago at East Lake. He was tied for the lead with Justin Rose going into the final round. McIlroy, Bubba Watson and Jim Furyk were three shots behind, Woods was another shot back. Snedeker had never won from the front, and he showed something that day. He closed with a 68 to win by three and claim the $10 million bonus as the FedEx Cup champion.
Since then, he has been asked at every stop if he splurged on anything. The answer remains no. Snedeker didn't even buy a new car. He started a foundation with his wife, Mandy, to help the underprivileged children in the Nashville area.
But he did tap into the experience of winning the FedEx Cup.
“I think when I play my best golf, my best golf is some of the best in the world,” Snedeker said after winning the Tour Championship.
Golf is about giving yourself chances, and that's what Snedeker is doing better than anyone at the moment. He has been in the top three in six of his last nine tournaments, including four out of six this year.
As he rapped putts Saturday morning at Pebble Beach, one longtime observer involved in plenty of big moments watched him and said, “This guy is winning a major this year.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Starkey: Pederson had to go at Pitt
- Steelers, young and old, thirst for opportunity to reach the postseason
- Penguins’ Crosby details his mumps experience
- Judge delays January trial on Penn State sanctions
- Developer reveals Buncher plans for 400 Strip District apartments, townhomes
- 2 longtime Pittsburgh nonprofits agree to merge
- Gettysburg national park poised to expand by 45 acres
- Chryst returns home, named football coach at Wisconsin
- Harvard study bolsters link between pollution, autism
- Pederson’s 2nd tenure as Pitt AD comes to abrupt end
- EPA tabs $3.1M to curb algae in Lake Erie