Analysis: Bradley, Clark faces of putter debate
By The Associated Press
Published: Monday, Feb. 25, 2013, 7:45 p.m.
Bruce Lietzke would have noticed a banana inside the cover of his long putter.
One of the famous stories about Lietzke is that he never touched a club when he wasn't on the PGA Tour. His caddie didn't believe him, so at the end of the 1984 season, he put a banana inside the head cover of Lietzke's driver before zipping up the travel bag. Some weeks later at the Bob Hope Classic, the caddie excitedly unzipped the travel bag.
“Sure enough, he pulled off that head cover, and the banana ... it was not yellow,” Lietzke said Monday. “It was black, nasty, fungus. He said he'd never doubt me again.”
Lietzke confessed to breaking his own rules when it came to the broom-handled putter that he picked up at the Phoenix Open in 1991 and used the rest of his career. Even in his down time, he would tinker with the length of the putter and practice with it. And he wonders what the conversation would have been like today if that 1991 PGA Championship had turned out differently.
Lietzke was the runner-up at Crooked Stick behind a big-hitting rookie named John Daly.
Imagine if Lietzke had won that major. Would the USGA have banned the putter he anchored against his chest?
“I think so,” Lietzke said. “Judging by their reaction to major successes, I guess they were just waiting for this to happen. The USGA should have made a statement then.”
That was one of the arguments PGA Tour commissioner Tim Finchem put forth Sunday when he said the tour was against the proposed rule that would ban the anchored stroke used for long putters and belly putters.
Without any empirical evidence that an anchored stroke is easier, why ban it?
The faces in this discussion — and that's all it is right now — are Keegan Bradley and Tim Clark, for vastly different reasons.
It was Bradley's win at the PGA Championship that prompted serious talk about the future of anchored strokes. Bradley is lumped in with three of the past five major champions using a belly putter, but he was the catalyst.
As for Clark?
It was his dignified speech at Torrey Pines that led even the staunch opponents of long putters to look at them differently. More than one person in the room that night has described his presentation as a game-changer.
That much was reflected in the overwhelming support from the Player Advisory Council and player-directors on the tour's policy board that the PGA Tour should oppose the USGA on this rule.
It's tricky figuring out where this will lead.
The PGA Tour sent the USGA a letter last week spelling out its opposition to Rule 14-1(b), and the PGA of America and its 27,000 club pros are also against the ban.
One reason Finchem decided to speak about the letter was his concern that the discussion was being portrayed as a showdown. Right now, it's a matter of opinion.
If it becomes a showdown, high noon is not until the USGA and R&A decide whether to go ahead with the rule. And that decision won't come until the spring.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Motivated quarterback Roethlisberger fights to prop up Steelers
- Penguins center Sutter is thriving despite unsettled 3rd line
- Kovacevic: Why give credence to Heisman?
- Century III new owner seeks to reverse vacancy trend with new theater
- Pirates sign free agent pitcher Volquez
- Pitt’s Donald wins Lombardi Award
- Geminid meteor shower takes the stage
- Steelers notebook: Worilds loses sack; Big Ben gets 1st career catch
- Health-insurance mandate poses potential hitch for volunteer fire companies
- Driver just misses hitting Latrobe officer
- Shaler grad Thorpe finding his way at PSU