A messy Masters and a beautiful finish
TribLIVE Sports Videos
AUGUSTA, Ga. — Maybe winning really does take care of everything.
For Augusta National, sizing up Adam Scott for his own green jacket was a beautiful way to end what had been shaping as a messy Masters.
The lasting image was Scott arching his back with both arms thrust in the air after he made a 12-foot birdie putt in the playoff, not European Tour chief referee John Paramor explaining to 14-year-old Guan Tianlang why he was being docked one shot for slow play.
An Australian in a green jacket — especially Adam Scott, the most popular first-time major champion since Phil Mickelson — should be far more memorable than Tiger Woods holding out his arm to take an illegal drop on the 15th hole. Listening to Scott so graciously pay homage to Australian golf great Greg Norman was much better than hearing Fred Ridley give a tutorial on Rule 33-7.
And one more thing.
Winning might take care of any doubts to outlaw the anchored stroke for long putters, like the one Scott pressed against his chest when he sank the two biggest putts of his career — a 20-footer on the 18th hole that got him into the playoff, and the 12-footer on the 10th hole to win in overtime over Angel Cabrera.
The USGA and Royal & Ancient are expected to announce shortly whether they will go ahead with the ban on anchoring, which would start in 2016. They say the proposed rule is to define what a golf stroke should be, and that they have no empirical evidence to suggest anyone has an advantage.
Results shouldn't count, either, especially the fact that Scott's win gave long putters the career Grand Slam.
Four of the last six major champions have used the long putter, starting with Keegan Bradley in the 2011 PGA Championship. Supporters of the ban would call that a trend. Opponents could argue it's a small sample.
Of course, to suggest that Scott gained an advantage by using the longer putt would be to overlook that he didn't make a putt longer than 4 feet from the third hole of the final round until that birdie putt on the 18th curled in the back of the cup.
Geoff Ogilvy summed it up nicely last summer when he said of Scott's long putter, “It just makes his bad days better. It doesn't make his good days better.”
Then again, Scott never seriously contended in a major championship until after he switched to the long putter in 2011. He tied for second at the Masters that year. He now has finished among the top 15 in the last six majors, including his win at the Masters.
Scott fears the USGA and R&A already have made up their minds. USGA president Glen Nager took part in a youth initiative last week at Augusta. He declined to say anything about long putters because the decision is pending.
“We are all waiting to hear what's going to happen,” Scott said. “I don't know that this is going to impact any decisions at all.”
If the governing bodies were looking to build their case at Augusta, they would have settled on Guan. The Chinese teenager started using a belly putter about six months before he won the Asia-Pacific Amateur to earn a spot in the Masters. The fear is more kids will start using anchored strokes under the best instruction, and it won't be long before conventional putters go the way of the 1-iron.
So in the meantime, let's not lose sight of the finish while it's still fresh.
There had never been a Masters where two players made birdie on the 18th hole to force a playoff.
Golf will get messy again soon enough.
We're still awaiting word from the PGA Tour, perhaps by the end of the month, on whether Vijay Singh will be punished for admitting he took deer antler spray, which is said to contain a banned substance under the anti-doping policy.
Ultimately, what should be remembered about this Masters is the right guy won.
For all the right reasons.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Rossi: Rutherford falling apart, too
- Pa. Senate’s top leader backs liquor privatization bill
- Police intercept drug courier returning to Western Pennsylvania with 316 bricks of heroin
- Steelers bring in 2 more cornerbacks for visits
- Woman struck by foul ball in ‘horrid’ scene at Pirates game
- Hyde Park woman will stand trial on charges she had sex with a teenage boy
- Monongahela man gets 18 to 36 years for kidnapping, rape and torture of 21-year-old woman
- Expert: Plum district’s silence about sex allegations could erode trust
- Authorities investigating as many as 20 dogs found dead in Hopewell
- Plum triumphs in meeting of section leaders
- Man to stand trial on molestation charges at day care